← Back to Blog
SAFMEDS14 min read

How to Build Your First SAFMEDS Deck: A Step-by-Step Guide

Learn how to create effective SAFMEDS card sets from scratch. This comprehensive guide covers content selection, card formatting, deck organization, and best practices for fluency-based learning.

TAFMEDS Team
Student organizing SAFMEDS flashcards into an effective study deck

How to Build Your First SAFMEDS Deck: A Step-by-Step Guide

You've learned about SAFMEDS. You understand the science. Now comes the practical question: how do you actually create a deck that works?

Building an effective SAFMEDS deck isn't just about writing terms on cards. The quality of your deck directly determines the quality of your learning. A well-constructed deck accelerates fluency; a poorly constructed one creates frustration and wasted effort.

This guide walks you through the complete process—from selecting content to formatting cards to organizing your deck for optimal practice. By the end, you'll have everything you need to create SAFMEDS decks that produce genuine fluency.


Why Deck Construction Matters

Before diving into the how-to, let's understand why this matters so much.

SAFMEDS works by building automatic retrieval—the ability to access information instantly without conscious effort. But automatic retrieval only develops when:

  • Stimuli are clear and unambiguous: You need to know exactly what's being asked
  • Responses are precise and consistent: You need to produce the same answer each time
  • Cards target atomic knowledge units: Each card tests one specific piece of information
  • A deck with vague prompts, multiple possible answers, or compound questions undermines every practice session. You might go through the motions, but fluency won't develop.

    Key Insight: The 10 minutes you spend constructing cards well saves hours of ineffective practice later. Quality deck construction is the highest-leverage activity in your SAFMEDS workflow.

    Step 1: Select Your Content Strategically

    Start with Priority Material

    Not all content deserves SAFMEDS treatment. The method is most valuable for:

  • Foundational knowledge that supports higher-level thinking
  • Technical terminology that must be recalled precisely
  • Facts and relationships that don't require extended explanation
  • High-frequency content that appears repeatedly in your field
  • For exam preparation, focus on:

  • Terms and definitions from your primary textbook or task list
  • Key concepts that appear across multiple chapters
  • Material you consistently struggle with during reading
  • Avoid SAFMEDS-Inappropriate Content

    Some content doesn't fit the SAFMEDS format:

    Appropriate for SAFMEDSNot Appropriate for SAFMEDS
    "Define reinforcement""Explain how to conduct a preference assessment"
    "What are the 4 functions of behavior?""Compare and contrast ABLLS-R and VB-MAPP"
    "Name the researcher who developed Precision Teaching""Describe the ethical considerations in behavior intervention"
    Common Mistake: Trying to force complex, multi-step content into SAFMEDS format. If the answer requires more than 1-2 sentences, it's probably not SAFMEDS material.

    Determine Deck Size

    Research on fluency building suggests optimal deck sizes:

  • New learners: Start with 20-30 cards per deck
  • Intermediate: 40-60 cards per deck
  • Advanced: Up to 100 cards per deck
  • Smaller decks allow you to reach fluency faster. Once fluent on one deck, you can either expand it or create a new deck for additional content.


    Step 2: Write Effective Card Content

    The Anatomy of a SAFMEDS Card

    Each card has two components:

  • Stimulus (Front): What triggers the response—typically a term, question, or prompt
  • Response (Back): What you say or think—typically a definition, answer, or explanation
  • Both components require careful construction.

    Writing Clear Stimuli

    The stimulus should:

  • Be unambiguous: Only one reasonable interpretation
  • Use consistent formatting: Same structure across the deck
  • Include necessary context: But no more than necessary
  • Weak StimulusStrong StimulusWhy It's Better
    "Reinforcement""Define: Reinforcement"Clarifies that a definition is expected
    "What's the difference?""Positive vs. Negative Reinforcement: Key difference?"Specifies exactly what's being asked
    "Behavior""In ABA, what is the technical definition of 'behavior'?"Indicates the expected level of precision

    Writing Precise Responses

    The response should:

  • Be memorizable: Short enough to recall in 3-5 seconds
  • Be complete: Includes all essential elements
  • Match your source material: Uses the same terminology as your textbook or task list
  • Weak ResponseStrong ResponseWhy It's Better
    "Making behavior happen more""A consequence that increases the future probability of a behavior"Technically precise and complete
    "There are four: attention, escape, tangible, automatic""SEAT: Social (attention), Escape, Access to tangibles, Automatic"Uses a mnemonic and categorization
    "It's the same thing as motivation""A temporary alteration in the value of a consequence and the frequency of behavior related to that consequence"Matches technical definitions

    The One-Card-One-Fact Rule

    Each card should test exactly one piece of knowledge. When you find yourself writing "and" in a response, consider splitting the card.

    Before (Compound Card):

  • Front: "Define positive reinforcement and give an example"
  • Back: "Adding a stimulus that increases behavior, like giving a child candy for completing homework"
  • After (Split into Two Cards):

  • Card 1 Front: "Define: Positive reinforcement"
  • Card 1 Back: "Adding a stimulus that increases the future probability of a behavior"
  • Card 2 Front: "Positive reinforcement example: child completing homework"
  • Card 2 Back: "Child receives candy after completing homework; homework completion increases"
  • Pro Tip

    If a card takes more than 5 seconds to respond to, it probably contains too much information. Split it.

    Step 3: Format for Fluency

    Keep Responses Speakable

    SAFMEDS originally stood for "Say All Fast..." The response should be something you can vocalize quickly. This matters even for silent practice because:

  • Speakable responses are easier to verify as correct
  • They create clearer mental representations
  • They're easier to recall under time pressure
  • Use Consistent Formatting Conventions

    Establish patterns for different card types:

    Definition Cards:

  • Front: "Define: [term]"
  • Back: "[definition]"
  • Identification Cards:

  • Front: "[description or example]"
  • Back: "[term being described]"
  • Relationship Cards:

  • Front: "[Term A] vs. [Term B]: Key difference?"
  • Back: "[Specific distinguishing characteristic]"
  • Category Cards:

  • Front: "List the [X] types of [category]"
  • Back: "[List with mnemonic if applicable]"
  • Include Mnemonics Strategically

    For lists or categories, mnemonics accelerate fluency:

    ContentWithout MnemonicWith Mnemonic
    4 functions of behavior"Attention, escape, tangible, automatic""SEAT: Social attention, Escape, Access, Automatic"
    7 dimensions of ABAList all seven every time"BATCAGE: Behavior, Analytic, Technological, Conceptually systematic, Applied, Generality, Effective"
    Mnemonic Rule: Use mnemonics for lists of 4+ items. Fewer items are usually fast enough without them.

    Step 4: Organize Your Deck Structure

    Group by Topic or Source

    Organize cards by the chapter, unit, or topic they come from. This allows you to:

  • Practice specific areas where you need improvement
  • Track which content areas are fluent vs. still developing
  • Align practice with your study schedule
  • Create Logical Progressions

    Within each section, order cards from fundamental to advanced:

  • Basic definitions first
  • Related concepts next
  • Distinctions and comparisons after that
  • Applications and examples last
  • This progression means earlier cards provide scaffolding for later ones.

    Use Tags or Categories

    If your deck system supports tagging (like TAFMEDS), categorize cards by:

  • Source: Chapter 1, Chapter 2, Task List Section A, etc.
  • Difficulty: Basic, Intermediate, Advanced
  • Priority: Must-know, Should-know, Nice-to-know
  • This enables targeted practice as exam day approaches.


    Step 5: Review and Refine

    Test Your Cards Before Committing

    Before your first official timing, do a slow walkthrough:

  • Read each stimulus and predict what response you'd give
  • Compare to the written response
  • Ask: "Is there only one reasonable answer to this question?"
  • Ask: "Can I say this response in 3-5 seconds?"
  • Identify and Fix Problem Cards

    During practice, note cards that consistently cause issues:

    ProblemLikely CauseFix
    Frequent hesitationAmbiguous stimulusClarify the question
    Inconsistent responsesMultiple valid answersStandardize the expected response
    Always getting wrongResponse too long or complexSplit the card or simplify
    Confusing similar cardsCards too alikeAdd distinguishing context

    Iterate Based on Data

    After a week of practice, review your performance data:

  • Which cards have the highest error rates?
  • Which cards slow you down most?
  • Are there patterns in your mistakes?
  • Revise problem cards based on these insights. A deck is never "finished"—it evolves as you learn what works for your brain.

    Continuous Improvement

    The best SAFMEDS practitioners treat deck construction as an ongoing process. Regular refinement compounds into dramatically better learning outcomes.

    Common Deck Construction Mistakes

    Mistake 1: Cards That Are Too Complex

    Problem Card:

  • Front: "Describe the difference between positive and negative reinforcement, including examples of each"
  • Back: "Positive reinforcement adds a stimulus to increase behavior (e.g., giving candy); negative reinforcement removes a stimulus to increase behavior (e.g., removing a seatbelt alarm)"
  • This card is testing at least four things. Split it into:

  • Definition of positive reinforcement
  • Example of positive reinforcement
  • Definition of negative reinforcement
  • Example of negative reinforcement
  • Mistake 2: Vague or Ambiguous Prompts

    Problem Card:

  • Front: "Reinforcement"
  • Back: "A consequence that increases behavior"
  • What's the question? Define it? Give an example? Explain the types? The stimulus must clarify expectations.

    Mistake 3: Inconsistent Response Formats

    Problem Deck:

  • Card 1 Back: "Adding a stimulus after behavior"
  • Card 2 Back: "When you take something away"
  • Card 3 Back: "This happens when the response produces the removal of something aversive"
  • Inconsistent formats make it harder to achieve fluency. Standardize your response structure.

    Mistake 4: Including Unnecessary Information

    Problem Card:

  • Front: "Who developed Precision Teaching, what year was it, and where was he working at the time?"
  • Back: "Ogden Lindsley, 1960s, Harvard and University of Kansas"
  • Unless all three pieces are equally important, split into separate cards focused on what actually matters.


    Deck Construction Checklist

    Before starting to practice with a new deck, verify:

    Content Selection

  • [ ] Focused on factual, retrievable knowledge
  • [ ] Priority content that supports larger learning goals
  • [ ] Appropriate deck size (20-60 cards to start)
  • Card Quality

  • [ ] Each card tests one specific fact
  • [ ] Stimuli are clear and unambiguous
  • [ ] Responses are concise and speakable
  • [ ] Consistent formatting across card types
  • Organization

  • [ ] Grouped by topic or source
  • [ ] Logical progression within sections
  • [ ] Tagged for targeted practice (if available)
  • Quality Check

  • [ ] Slow walkthrough completed
  • [ ] Problem cards identified and revised
  • [ ] No cards require more than 5 seconds to answer

  • Building Decks in TAFMEDS

    If you're using TAFMEDS for your SAFMEDS practice, deck construction is streamlined:

    Creating a New Deck:

  • Navigate to your deck library
  • Click "Create New Deck"
  • Name your deck clearly (e.g., "BCBA Ethics - Cooper Ch. 27")
  • Add cards using the term/definition format
  • Best Practices for TAFMEDS:

  • Use the import feature for bulk card creation
  • Apply tags during creation for easier organization later
  • Let the app handle shuffling—focus on card quality
  • Review your analytics to identify cards needing revision
  • With proper deck construction, TAFMEDS handles the timing, shuffling, and tracking automatically—you can focus purely on learning.


    Your First Deck: A Quick-Start Guide

    Ready to build your first deck right now? Here's a 15-minute process:

    Minutes 1-5: Select Content

  • Open your textbook or study materials
  • Identify 20-25 key terms from one chapter
  • Focus on definitions and core concepts
  • Minutes 5-12: Create Cards

  • Write each term as a "Define: [term]" stimulus
  • Write concise definitions as responses
  • Check that each response is speakable in under 5 seconds
  • Minutes 12-15: Quality Check

  • Read through all cards once
  • Revise any ambiguous stimuli
  • Split any compound cards
  • You now have a functional SAFMEDS deck ready for timed practice.


    Conclusion

    Building an effective SAFMEDS deck requires intentionality at every step:

  • Select strategically: Focus on high-value, fact-based content
  • Write precisely: Clear stimuli, concise responses, one fact per card
  • Format for fluency: Speakable, consistent, includes mnemonics where helpful
  • Organize logically: Grouped by topic, progressing from basic to advanced
  • Refine continuously: Use performance data to improve problem cards
  • The time you invest in deck construction pays dividends throughout your learning journey. A well-built deck is a precision tool for building fluency. A poorly built deck is a source of frustration that undermines every practice session.

    Start with one chapter, one topic, one unit. Build 20-30 cards following these principles. Practice with proper timing and shuffling. Then expand from there.

    Your first deck won't be perfect—but it will be far better than a deck built without these principles. And with each revision based on your practice data, it will get better still.

    What content will you turn into SAFMEDS cards first?

    Start building your decks with TAFMEDS and let the system guide you through effective card creation.


  • What is SAFMEDS? The Complete Guide - Understand the methodology before building your deck
  • 5 Common SAFMEDS Mistakes and How to Fix Them - Avoid pitfalls in your practice
  • Why 60 Seconds Changes Everything - The science behind timed practice

  • References

  • Binder, C. (1996). Behavioral fluency: Evolution of a new paradigm. *The Behavior Analyst, 19*(2), 163-197.
  • Eshleman, J. W. (2000). SAFMEDS research in the Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration. *The Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 17*(1), 58-67.
  • Graf, S., & Lindsley, O. R. (2002). *Standard Celeration Charting 2002*. Youngstown, OH: Graf Implements.
  • Johnson, K. R., & Street, E. M. (2004). The Morningside Model of Generative Instruction: What It Means to Leave No Child Behind. *Concord, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies*.
  • Kubina, R. M., & Yurich, K. K. L. (2012). *The Precision Teaching Book*. Lemont, PA: Greatness Achieved.
  • Lindsley, O. R. (1996). The four free-operant freedoms. *The Behavior Analyst, 19*(2), 199-210.
  • Tags

    SAFMEDSdeck buildingflashcardsstudy tipsfluencygetting started

    Save or print this article

    T

    TAFMEDS Team

    The TAFMEDS team creates evidence-based content on fluency building, Precision Teaching, and study strategies for ABA students and professionals.

    Stay Updated on Fluency-Based Learning

    Get weekly insights on Precision Teaching, SAFMEDS strategies, and study tips delivered to your inbox.

    No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We respect your privacy.

    Continue Reading

    Ready to Build Fluency?

    Start practicing with TAFMEDS today and experience the power of fluency-based learning.